It's the start of March 2014! Which means looking back at February 2014! Let's take a gander at the errors that were detected on the Yahoo! Canada homepage last month. On February 2 there was an apostrophe in stars that shouldn't have been there. Plus, in the same-item teaser below the larger version (second from left), appearance was misspelled. Then,
well, then I was debating if the previous post on this blog was also the final one. I'd look at that first image above and think, 'Do I post it all alone and that's it? Or do I delete it and no more posts? Or do I keep this train a-rolling?' The days slowly crept by, and then February 25 happened. I signed out of my Yahoo! email and saw the image above. But their could be? Really? Okay, I'll capture that one and do at least one more post. Then,
February 25 wasn't done with me yet. At the same time as the their/there error, Yahoo! was displaying this. Get rid of or and you have somethere here, Yahoo! - or, rather, you have something hear. Then,
February 25 still wasn't done with me. Displayed at the same time as the previous two images was this misspelling of surprisingly. Then,
another one from February 25, at the same time as the previous three! Why didn't anyone didn't anyone notice the repeated he has he has? Was Daniel Radcliffe too much of a distraction for the writer (and proofreader, if applicable)? Then,
you won't believe it. Maybe you will. It's a fifth image in the "simultaneously on February 25, 2014" series. How he's trains for the Games. Sure. Whatever you say. Uh huh. Then,
from February 28, it's an it's that should have been its. Semi-related, this error makes me want to go visit the monkeys at Batu Caves and the spiders at Penang Hill. And finally (in more ways than one?),
later on February 28 I signed out of my Yahoo! email and this was the top story that greeted me. Either his or a should have been jettisoned - can't have both! Click an image to enlarge it.
Showing posts with label there/their/they're. Show all posts
Showing posts with label there/their/they're. Show all posts
Saturday, March 1, 2014
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Condensed badness

Tuesday, September 6, 2011
24 hours Vancouverrors



Sunday, May 29, 2011
There's an error

Labels:
CBC,
CBC Sports,
homophones,
misspellings,
there/their/they're,
wrong words
Saturday, May 28, 2011
CBC British Columbia homepagerrors



Saturday, May 14, 2011
You see orcas? I see errors!


Saturday, April 16, 2011
24 hours Vancouverrors








Saturday, February 13, 2010
They must have their reasons, but what would there reasons be?
Thursday, January 21, 2010
the mattress their holding

Thursday, December 31, 2009
scolding a naughty child at a park or in a public place if they're parent isn't nearby
Saturday, July 11, 2009
As long as their is room for them to go, they will go away."
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
They're golf handicaps are within two strokes.
-- "Freaky Good" in Sports Illustrated on May 4, 2009
During the many years of having a Sports Illustrated subscription (thanks Jamushka!), I rarely found errors. When I heard there was a feature on the Sedin twins, I sought it out online. I'm not sure if the online text is the same as the print text - I'd think they'd be the same; if anything, errors found in print should be fixed online - but they're doesn't mean their anywhere.
Saturday, March 14, 2009
the cutest couple in there 80s
Saturday, January 17, 2009
straight couple in there 40s
Wednesday, January 14, 2009
to get tickets before their sold out

Maybe the band will compromise their integrity, morality and principles in exchange for money, success or other personal gain (according to Wikipedia's Selling out page). Or maybe the word their should be they're.
Labels:
facebook,
homophones,
misspellings,
there/their/they're,
wrong words
Monday, September 8, 2008
Saturday, June 14, 2008
There preference
COPE executive members who count in these matters have turned their noses
up at the prospect of a deal if [Al] De Genova is the Vision candidate. His time as an NPA politician/fundraiser doesn't sit well. They would hold their noses and go along with [Raymond] Louie even though he is one of the villains in the breakaway group that they say left them in debt. There preference is [Gregor] Robertson who is unscathed by any history in municipal political wars.
-- Vision clouded by Ladner win in The Vancouver Courier, Friday June 13 2008
Correction: Their preference

-- Vision clouded by Ladner win in The Vancouver Courier, Friday June 13 2008
Correction: Their preference
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)