Showing posts with label CityTV. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CityTV. Show all posts
Friday, June 1, 2012
2+2=?
It's poor quality, but it's a photo of a bottom-of-screen television caption so what are ya gonna do? It's not timely, but again, what are ya gonna do? Sue me? Please don't sue me. A little while ago, the Devils had beaten the Rangers 4-1 to tie their best-of-seven series at 2-2. What's two plus two? Four. That game was game number four. Not five. Four. From CityTV's Breakfast Television on May 22, 2012. Click the image to enlarge it.
Labels:
CityTV,
factual errors,
numbers,
Vancouver BC
Friday, July 23, 2010
Surrey Mayor Diane Watts
Saturday, December 20, 2008
TRAVEL ADVISORY in affect
Monday, July 7, 2008
leaves on person dead
Thursday, June 19, 2008
targetted

-- Bottom-of-screen tidbit on CityTV's Breakfast Television, Wednesday June 18 2008
Correction: targeted
Labels:
Breakfast Television,
CityTV,
misspellings,
nonwords,
Vancouver BC
Thursday, May 22, 2008
Today - Voting or Redesigning?
Vancouver City Council voting on plan to redesign Granville Street today.
-- Bottom-of-screen tidbit on CityTV news, Thursday May 22 2008
Are they potentially redesigning the street today, or are they voting today? It's the latter, so today should be after voting. According to this site, Vancouver City Council approved "the re-design concepts and budget for the re-construction of Granville Street expected to start this Fall".
-- Bottom-of-screen tidbit on CityTV news, Thursday May 22 2008
Are they potentially redesigning the street today, or are they voting today? It's the latter, so today should be after voting. According to this site, Vancouver City Council approved "the re-design concepts and budget for the re-construction of Granville Street expected to start this Fall".
Labels:
CityTV,
date/time confusion,
Vancouver BC
Thursday, February 14, 2008
very unique
Back with me is a computer graphics specialist with a very unique name.
-- Who Wants to Be a Millionaire on CityTV, Thursday February 14th 2008
unique
–adjective
1. existing as the only one or as the sole example
reference
Therefore, very is incorrectly used. I've heard and read this incorrect use many times and now you will probably start noticing it as well. Also, shouldn't there be a question mark at the end of the show's title?
-- Who Wants to Be a Millionaire on CityTV, Thursday February 14th 2008
unique
–adjective
1. existing as the only one or as the sole example
reference
Therefore, very is incorrectly used. I've heard and read this incorrect use many times and now you will probably start noticing it as well. Also, shouldn't there be a question mark at the end of the show's title?
Labels:
CityTV,
extra words,
incorrect use,
Vancouver BC
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)