Showing posts with label CityTV. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CityTV. Show all posts

Friday, June 1, 2012

2+2=?

It's poor quality, but it's a photo of a bottom-of-screen television caption so what are ya gonna do? It's not timely, but again, what are ya gonna do? Sue me? Please don't sue me. A little while ago, the Devils had beaten the Rangers 4-1 to tie their best-of-seven series at 2-2. What's two plus two? Four. That game was game number four. Not five. Four. From CityTV's Breakfast Television on May 22, 2012. Click the image to enlarge it.

Friday, July 23, 2010

Surrey Mayor Diane Watts

Don't believe what you may have read on CityTV's Breakfast Television yesterday - the actual mayor of Surrey is Dianne Watts.

Saturday, December 20, 2008

TRAVEL ADVISORY in affect

-- Bottom-of-screen tidbit on CityTV's Breakfast Television on December 18, 2008

The travel advisory was in effect and it affected drivers.

Monday, July 7, 2008

leaves on person dead

-- Bottom-of-screen tidbit on CityTV's Breakfast Television, Monday July 7 2008

Correction: leaves one person dead

Thursday, June 19, 2008

targetted

Vancouver Police say home invasion at Dogwood St & Cartier was targetted.
-- Bottom-of-screen tidbit on CityTV's Breakfast Television, Wednesday June 18 2008
Correction: targeted

Thursday, May 22, 2008

Today - Voting or Redesigning?

Vancouver City Council voting on plan to redesign Granville Street today.
-- Bottom-of-screen tidbit on CityTV news, Thursday May 22 2008

Are they potentially redesigning the street today, or are they voting today? It's the latter, so today should be after voting. According to this site, Vancouver City Council approved "the re-design concepts and budget for the re-construction of Granville Street expected to start this Fall".

Thursday, February 14, 2008

very unique

Back with me is a computer graphics specialist with a very unique name.
-- Who Wants to Be a Millionaire on CityTV, Thursday February 14th 2008

unique
–adjective
1. existing as the only one or as the sole example
reference

Therefore, very is incorrectly used. I've heard and read this incorrect use many times and now you will probably start noticing it as well. Also, shouldn't there be a question mark at the end of the show's title?