In an article ("Ryan Gosling Syndrome" in
Vancouver 24 hours on November 6, 2009) that is based entirely on the sexiness of Ryan Gosling, it'd probably be a good idea to open the article with a reference to Gosling being one of the
sexiest celebrities. Calling him sexist is a slightly different accusation.
If you can't be bothered to proofread and catch the sexist/sexiest error, why would you even pretend to care that, in this case,
mean time is one word?
Last but not least, a
whose for
who's error to close the article.
In an article ("Ryan Gosling Syndrome" in Vancouver 24 hours on November 6, 2009) that is based entirely on the sexiness of Ryan Gosling, it'd probably be a good idea to open the article with a reference to Gosling being one of the sexiest celebrities. Calling him sexist is a slightly different accusation.
If you can't be bothered to proofread and catch the sexist/sexiest error, why would you even pretend to care that, in this case, mean time is one word?
Last but not least, a whose for who's error to close the article.
No comments:
Post a Comment