
It irks me a little that people mistakenly put that apostrophe in there quite often, but when it's in their own advertisement with the logo pictured in the same ad showing no apostrophe, well, that irks me a lot
It irks me a little that people mistakenly put that apostrophe in there quite often, but when it's in their own advertisement with the logo pictured in the same ad showing no apostrophe, well, that irks me a lot
I've posted several of these quotes-of-the-article type of errors, but this one takes the cake. Why is copy-and-paste not a possibility? The first thing that caught my eye was the a a------! error (the article correctly has an), but upon further review, there's a plethora of errors. At the end of the purple-quoted text, there should be a single closing quotation mark before the double closing quotation mark. You know what, there are just too many differences between the article's text and the quoted text, so I leave it to you: How many differences can you spot?
I normally don't include user comments from sites such as YouTube and Facebook, as people are generally writing quickly and aren't expected to be professional, but this one highlights a common mistake: could of instead of could have or could've. How can someone write it correctly and incorrectly just a few words apart? It boggles my mind.
Placing an N directly before the second D would change the surname to FERDINAND, which happens to be the correct spelling.
Two attempts, two fails. The second attempt came close to the correct beleaguered, but close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades. Exact same text appeared in the paper's next edition five days later.
Who can spell perennial correctly?
The word a is singular. The word moments is plural. Omit the s and then there's agreement.
That is a painful opening line to an article. I was half expecting it to be an article about education/grammar. Actually, more like quarter expecting - it is 24 hours after all. The article's subject is children's hairstyles. Here's a screenshot of the newspaper's homepage, which links to the article:
There should be a comma after Chile in the bold opening. The writer correctly writes with its colonial architectural gems, but then writes with it's modern skyscrapers in the very same sentence! In the photo caption there is an interesting, albeit incorrect, take on the word panoramic.
I'd like to crown the writer, if you know what I mean.
click image to enlarge
-- "In the city" in Westender on January 22, 2009
The misspelling of peek is often found in close proximity to sneak. I wonder if the writer would correctly spell peek in sneak's absence.
Is this a compromise between watch the inauguration and watch Obama's inauguration?
There are issues with the spelling of unforeseen.
I've looked all over - where r you?
Three people get assaulted but only one is a victim. Why?
Makes me think of the ending of "All Tore Up" by The Tragically Hip:
tonight's the night; tonight's the night, tonight; tonight's the night; tonight; tonight tonight tonight; tonight's the night, tonight; tonight tonight tonight; tonight's the night; tonight; tonight tonight tonight
Maybe the band will compromise their integrity, morality and principles in exchange for money, success or other personal gain (according to Wikipedia's Selling out page). Or maybe the word their should be they're.