Friday, May 20, 2011

This is professional writing?! That's ludicrous!

Is it just me or does it's clear from estimates debate not make any sense? I could just be reading it wrong. However, I do know that roll should be role. From "Premier using government staff in byelection: NDP" on CBC News online on May 10, 2011. Later in the article,

there is a suspicious misspelling of ludicrous. A simple spell check would have caught that. In the second paragraph there are a couple of extra of extra words - can you spot them? Then,

this is the article's final paragraph and the writer ended on a low note; in should be is. Click an image to enlarge it.

No comments: