-- "Olympic Village cost overruns could wipe out profit" on CBC News online on October 6, 2009The error is the extra N in Rennie; it's too bad the writer didn't put an extra O in Bob.
-- "Olympic Village cost overruns could wipe out profit" on CBC News online on October 6, 2009
The image above shows the poll question from yesterday's Vancouver 24 hours. Good enough. However when showing the poll's results, the first sentence was dropped.
The result is a nonsensical question requiring the reader to recall the full question from the day before - if they even saw it at all. Granted, the Canucks may have been the only local sports team at 0-2 (now they're 0-3!), but I still think dropping the first sentence is a mistake. Then there's this, yesterday's results from Friday's poll (not Sunday, as their "yesterday" implies):
Is it really that hard to match up the color of the majority poll result with the color of the larger piece of the pie? I understand that the poll section of the paper is very low priority and is an easy space-killer, but since it's in the paper at all, maybe a tad more care should be paid.
-- MSN Canada homepage on October 6, 2009
-- "Neeson in town" in Vancouver 24 hours on October 5, 2009
-- "Thousands support power of pink at run" in Vancouver 24 hours on October 5, 2009
Before the paper's design overhaul, a front page advertisement always had a small-print heading of PAID ADVERTISMENT. The inaugural post-overhaul issue had a front page advertisement with a very visible error, but no declaration of advertis(e)ment, paid or otherwise. Above is the second post-overhaul front page advertisement -from yesterday's issue - and while PAID is gone, ADVERTISMENT is present. Overhaul incomplete.
-- "Sneak peak at fall entertainment" in Vancouver 24 hours on October 2, 2009
-- "Don't procastinate on important conversations" in The Vancouver Courier on September 25, 2009
-- "Book keepers" in The Vancouver Courier on September 25, 2009