The obvious error here is was, which no doubt is supposed to be who. But less obvious, from my point of view, is their valuables. The valuables belong to "a woman" so shouldn't it be her valuables? The other corrective option is to change tricks a woman into a date to tricks women into dates and leaving their valuables as-is. From "Date gone bad" in 24 hours Vancouver on January 24, 2011.
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
Priceless writing
The obvious error here is was, which no doubt is supposed to be who. But less obvious, from my point of view, is their valuables. The valuables belong to "a woman" so shouldn't it be her valuables? The other corrective option is to change tricks a woman into a date to tricks women into dates and leaving their valuables as-is. From "Date gone bad" in 24 hours Vancouver on January 24, 2011.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment