Oh,
24H Vancouver, how ridiculous you are. The headline for this article - "Kerr aims to preserves our past" in yesterday's edition - is above and it sets the tone for the rest of the article.
Preserves should be without the second S.
It looks like the article's writer finds proper spelling and punctuation "bland and uninteresting" - how else to explain the comma in
find's?
Finally, the article's end is seen above. Or is it the end? I can't tell if there is just a missing period, or if there are missing words beyond
authentic in addition to a missing period. What's your guess?
Oh, 24H Vancouver, how ridiculous you are. The headline for this article - "Kerr aims to preserves our past" in yesterday's edition - is above and it sets the tone for the rest of the article. Preserves should be without the second S.
It looks like the article's writer finds proper spelling and punctuation "bland and uninteresting" - how else to explain the comma in find's?
Finally, the article's end is seen above. Or is it the end? I can't tell if there is just a missing period, or if there are missing words beyond authentic in addition to a missing period. What's your guess?
No comments:
Post a Comment