data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d56f/5d56f580375327763c27a208dc893c13a7088ed2" alt=""
Go ahead and type www.healinestheatre.com into your browser's address bar - or click that green link. Find any more info about Shattering? No? Compare the name of the presenting theatre with the website's address to discover why not.
Go ahead and type www.healinestheatre.com into your browser's address bar - or click that green link. Find any more info about Shattering? No? Compare the name of the presenting theatre with the website's address to discover why not.
This is a basic agreement error. A single plan backfires, while multiple plans backfire.
I believe (or, rather, I personally believe, as is the current trend) that they want qualified candidates to send resumes, though any resume that can send itself would likely be hired immediately by any company, for novelty alone.
Prepare yourselves. Maybe you should be sitting. The trouble begins in the photo's caption. The phrase guest stars shouldn't have a hyphen, and it's OMNI, not ONMI. The article subject's name is correct in the caption, and the headline, but then incorrect in the opening sentence. How does that happen? I'm guessing the writer had Sarah Jessica Parker on the mind. As you can see, the initials used in the article are correct. Then, we have more no's than yes's instead of more nos than yeses.
But wait, it gets even better. In the subsequent edition of Vancouver 24 Hours, Friday September 26 2008, is this:
After several days of being error-free, this newish features returns to its old ways.
Last time it was a twice-guarenteed sandwich ad. This time it's a bigger one-off at the top of the back of the paper. And once again guaranteed is spelled correctly in the checklist.
The last name is correctly written as Turpel-Lafond later in the article, so why not here?
Is it it is wasn't long before or it was wasn't long before?
You wanted to run back to your yuppy gym.
Firstly, McDonald's has got an apostrophe. Secondly, you will guess you could just get started? I guess technically that could be correct, but who says or writes that?
First no hyphen where a hyphen belongs, and then a hyphen where a hyphen doesn't belong. English 101 anybody? Wait, maybe I should be more tolerant. Perhaps Dhaliwal didn't properly pronounce the hyphen.
The correction would entail either omitting for, or replacing choosing with going.
Walsh was probably less jubilant - sorry, jubliant - after this misspelling appeared.
Comma overload! Comma overload! I suggest jettisoning the second one.
It looks to me like the word concerts got omitted, leaving a somewhat dirty sentence. Or maybe it's just me. Everything is dirty to a dirty mind. However, I do give some points for five and six instead of 5 and 6. Let's make it eleven points.
Of. We were looking for of. In fact, we're still looking.
Good call, Amy Poehler. I mean Poelher. No. Wait. Ummmm, Poehler. I'll go with Poehler.
The word situations is plural, so it should be either In situations like these or In a situation like this.
Mark Messier: "Betcha can't type it just once."
The misspelling is in the photo's caption. As can be seen in the article, the correct name of the Transportation Minister is Kevin Falcon. The use of pedal in the caption has me puzzled. If the writer had used quotation marks around the word, or written peddle, then I'd tip my hat to the writer. But as it stands, it looks they just made a spelling error. One last thing: when naming people in a photo, it is customary to use left and right or similar cues to help the reader identify the people. With Campbell named first in the caption, it makes me think that he is the person on the left. He is actually on the right.
Check check, can you hear what I am saying? More problems with this new "Whose eyes" feature. First it was a factual error, followed by a misspelled name. Now it's the double-word phenomenon. Which type of error is next?
I'm guessing it should read, whether the risk to the child.
At some point before going to print, one has to decide how they want to word it. Go with were, or go with have been, but for the love of fun don't go with both.
You can approve seismic upgrades and you can give approval for seismic upgrades, but you can't give approve seismic upgrades.
I was going to merely suggest adding a t to make it cut, but now I am of the opinion that the t should replace the unnecessary comma.
Silly Bennywenny, saying the wrong word. Doesn't he know that the word that best fits what he's trying to say (or so I'm led to believe) is flair, not flare.
Get off the off the off the ground, off the ground.