I'm confused. Why was $8,000 correctly left alone with no accompanying
dollars, while later in the same sentence (from "
Kash Heed's manager alleges $40K more in spending" on CBC News online on October 28, 2011) $5,500 incorrectly - and redundantly - had
dollars following it? In the next sentence,
either the word
and needs to be inserted between
involved and
have or the word
were needs to be removed. Then,
$40,000 is
dollars-free, but $5,500 again sees
dollars following closely. Also, Barinder Sall is Sall every time in the article, but when Rankin asks him then he's temporarily short an L. Click an image to enlarge it.
I'm confused. Why was $8,000 correctly left alone with no accompanying dollars, while later in the same sentence (from "Kash Heed's manager alleges $40K more in spending" on CBC News online on October 28, 2011) $5,500 incorrectly - and redundantly - had dollars following it? In the next sentence,
either the word and needs to be inserted between involved and have or the word were needs to be removed. Then,
$40,000 is dollars-free, but $5,500 again sees dollars following closely. Also, Barinder Sall is Sall every time in the article, but when Rankin asks him then he's temporarily short an L. Click an image to enlarge it.
No comments:
Post a Comment